I have always been fascinated by the Walt Disney World
Monorail System. Although it is sometimes inconvenient to use to get out of the
Magic Kingdom after a parade or fireworks, it is also one of the perks that
makes staying at the Grand Floridian, Contemporary or Polynesian resorts
special. Park hopping from Epcot to Magic Kingdom can be done on the monorail
without the hassle of driving. The monorail is one of the things that makes
Walt Disney World special.
I have always wondered what it would be like if the monorail
connected Hollywood Studios and Animal Kingdom to the other two parks. So, about two years
ago I decided to spend some of my free time to try to figure out how that might
work. After writing a thesis, finishing grad school with a degree in urban
planning, finding a job and getting married, I am still pretty far from having
an answer. I do not have access to the kinds of data necessary to adequately
answer the question, but I have decided to make do with what I have and see how
far I could get.
First, like in any planning project, you have to start by establishing
some goals and making some assumptions. What would Disney's goal be for
expanding the monorail system? A good place to start would be to look at the
existing monorail.
Goal 1: Expand the
number of resorts with monorail access.
The three monorail resorts are some of the nicest resorts at
Disney World, but they also tend to be more expensive than the other
deluxe-level Disney resorts. The convenient access provided by the monorail to
the theme parks must be responsible for some of this price difference. If Disney
was to expand the monorail, one of the goals should be to expand the number of
resort hotels that could charge a premium for monorail access. A higher
priority should be given for deluxe and Disney Vacation Club resorts because
they cater to people already shown to be willing to pay for a premium Disney
vacation. Additionally, the value and moderate resorts may be more likely to
cater to families who drove to Orlando and have a car on property.
Goal 2: Make park hopping
easier.
The existing monorail is also heavily used for park hopping
between Epcot and Magic Kingdom, but getting to Animal Kingdom or Hollywood Studios
requires a bus or car ride[i].
Convenient park hopping is important because it can keep people on property for
more of the day. If it is too much of a hassle to get between two parks, guests
may spend less money on food and souvenirs at their hotel than at a theme park.
Goal 3: Make leaving
Magic Kingdom easier at the end of the day.
Lines for the monorail after the fireworks or nighttime
parade can be more than 30 minutes on even a moderately crowded day. If the
monorail was responsible for getting a larger share of resort guests back to
their hotels, it would need a substantial increase in capacity.
Goal 4: Be easy to use
and provide equal or better service than buses.
It should go without saying, but an expanded monorail needs
to be simple enough for non-English-speaking tourists to use, and it needs to
get people where they want to go better than the existing buses and monorails. Any
expansion of the monorail would be expensive, so that money would need to
provide real benefits over the existing transportation infrastructure. The
overall trip times (including wait times and transfer times) need to be as good
or better than the existing system, and all hotel-to-park trips should be
possible with no more than one transfer.
Assumption 1: Monorail
trains can be extended.
Currently, the Mark VI trains have six cars. At some point
in the past, the monorail trains had five cars. Obviously, if monorail trains
were longer, the stations would need to be longer. But I am assuming that there
would be no insurmountable technical limit to the length of the trains.
Assumption 2: Monorail
load times can be shorter.
The load time on the monorail is currently limited to the
amount of time it takes to load and unload wheelchairs with ramps. Because the
monorail doors open out, the floor of the monorail is a step higher than the station
platform. Each station has cast members who manually have to wheel ramps to the
doors and lay them down. The guests in wheelchairs must carefully navigate the
ramps while the other guests wait. The wheelchair capacity of the monorail is
limited by the number of cast members staffed at the stations, and the entire
process greatly increases the time necessary to load the train. If the monorail
system was expanded, existing stations would need to be modified and additional
trains would need to be commissioned. Existing trains would probably be retired
or refurbished to match the new trains. Therefore, the new trains and stations
could be built to have platform-level boarding. This type of boarding would
eliminate the step up on to the train and allow wheelchairs and strollers to be
driven aboard without assistance, and could reduce the time spent loading and
unloading.
Assumption 3: Monorail
demand is proportional to the number of rooms at a given resort.
This is likely to be an unrealistic assumption, but without
actual origin-destination data, it is as good as I can do. Since the monorail
would need to be effective in the extremely busy few weeks at the end of
December, I will be assuming that the monorail will be distributing guests to
and from the resort hotels based on the number of rooms at the hotels at full
occupancy. In actuality, the hotels probably have different numbers of guests
per room and different theme park visitation preferences. But without this data
(and without access to the more sophisticated transportation demand modeling
software), I will have to assume a consistent distribution across hotels.
I will probably add additional assumptions and goals as I
progress, but I think this will give you a good idea of my approach to this
project. Next time I will describe different potential monorail system layouts.
Feel free to post in the comments if you want to challenge any of my goals and
assumptions, I would love to hear from you.
[i]
Yes, I am aware that you can get between Epcot and Hollywood Studios on foot or
by boat, but it takes more than 30 minutes and is probably not responsible for
many of that type of park hopping trips.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.